“SLEEP APNEA: A DRUG DISCOVERY”

“SLEEP APNEA: A DRUG DISCOVERY”

------------------------------------------------------.

Discovery of a Drug/Medicine by Me (The Undersigned/Emailer)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

For last two years, I was trying to find a cure for “Sleep Apnea” through a drug or medicine, as I searched net about informations & cures about this dreaded disease, from which (sleep apnea) more people suffer than any other diseases in the word, but no cure was found at the research centers/sites of these world famed universities, only a few some known things have been prescribed by them, often very repeated ones, even world’s biggest doctors & researchers have not been able make any breakthrough.

Their common advises are :- 1, leave smoking. 2, avoid alcohol. 3, avoid take sleeping pills/sedatives. 4, lose weight. 5, sleep on sides/keep head slightly more elevated while sleeping. 6, take healthy diet & maintain a healthy leaving 7, avoid heavy meals before sleep. 8, exercise. 9, use of CPAP or other oral applications (mechanical devises) & 10, surgery (surgery may worsen the problem).

For last two years, I too was trying to find out a solution (I am not a doctor or researcher, but has an interest in medicine & diseases and I study as an amateur, think on this problem, try to find a solution as far as my situation affords me to do) for sleep apnea.

By chance about six months back, I hit upon a solution & I have been doing its trial last for 6 months and I am being almost fully (almost 100%, try or do this experiment yourselves), successful in curing “Sleep Apnea”.

The drug or medicine that came to my mind was “coffee”, that is, taking a cup of coffee (not cold coffee) before sleep (those who are suffering from sleep apnea), “after meal” at night.

Actually I was trying to find a solution to cure the loosening of inner throat & nasal muscles during sleep, due to age, alcohol usage, drug/sedative usages or it may be naturally occurring, when I found nothing could cure (even surgery) sleep apnea, i.e. keeping the muscles tight (taut) at sleep for a patient of “sleep apnea”, as they get relaxed & become loose in sleep and create obstruction to “breathing”, causing “suffocations”.

Then, I tried to find out a “stimulant” which could keep muscles tight even at sleep also will be harmless (i.e. non-intoxicating and non-addictive), & I hit upon “the coffee” (I tried tea and other stimulant drinks of different company-brands, but found non effective).

But drinking a cup of warm coffee with milk (not black coffee), as milk also works as a stimulant, that’s why in snake-bites warm milk is given to prevent collapse or comma, “the coffee” did miracle, it stopped (if not cured) “sleep apnea” almost 100%, in my experiments.

Anybody who has sleep apnea (even severest types) can use this medication/prescription & do this treatment and find if this “discovery” holds true or not.

(Two stints of light breathing exercises of five minutes after two five minutes light workouts in empty stomach add value to this medication)

I would like, one must comment back on one’s experience in my email address.

(Note: use of coffee or any abstract or enzyme or chemical extracted from coffee for making any kind of medicine or drug for sleep apnea disease by anyone or any company or any entity for commercial or professional or amateurish use or purpose without my express permission is highly prohibited, shall be an illegal act & unlawful at any corner of the world, other than personal use & experimentation, even printing of this article or abstracts from this article in any form or any such articles based on this article or this discovery is strictly restricted without my express permission, even publication of any news in any form, even in short form in any print media or electronic media without my express permission is not permissible).

The article may appear too short, but I feel it is immensely valuable, as it may bring relief to millions, also kick start a business of billion dollars for a pharmaceutical or any other company.

(Common advises should also be adhered to for making this medication most effective)

 Sd/-

Subhro Das

Ashram Road, At, PO: ARARIA, India, PIN: 854311

Date : 01 May, 2014

WHY THE IMBALANCE, THAT NATURE IS TRYING TO CURE?

WHY THE IMBALANCE, THAT NATURE IS TRYING TO CURE?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

As every act, action, event or product is in fact a reaction. Nothing originates of or from given situation itself without a previous act, action, event or product. That is, within & outside the system, manifestation of an act, action, event or product is a resultant, a reaction. That nothing is Sywambhu, self produced (in Sanskrit, meaning is, originated by itself, as Hindu mythology believes, creation of this universe is Sywambhu, self produced, but this contradicts physics).

It is easy to see & explain, why every act, action, event or product is a reaction, for example, if we take Newton’s 3^rd law, when a billiard ball strikes another billiard ball, later moves in reaction, but 1^st ball too moved due to some reaction to an action.

From above we can derive two postulations:-

1^st Postulation: ALL ACTIONS ARE REACTIONS.

We see acts, actions, events & products all around us, all through out the universe & it is scientifically true as per laws of physics, also mathematically has to be true, that all these acts, actions, events, or products are due to some other acts, actions, events or products & this line goes into the deepest past, to the origin of the universe as no act, action, event or product is possible without a (or more than one) previous act, action, event or product, that is, ALL ACTIONS ARE REACTIONS. Newton’s 3^rd law is: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction (by Google search: NASA’s line is quoted), it may be said the other way: “every action is a reaction”.

2^nd Postulation: IMBALANCE IS INHERENT.

One action can be possible only if there is an imbalance, as laws physics will be violated, if any act, action, event or product is happening without imbalance, take the example of billiard ball again, 2^nd ball moved only due to an imbalance. So 2^nd postulation is, there is inherent an imbalance in the nature & nature/universe is trying to cure it.

Yes, this universe must have caused itself to originate (big bang or anything: the beginning) without outside influence or interference, as nothing exists outside the universe, even space-time is a property within the universe, no space-time or matter-energy exist out of the universe or existed before the universe, SO THIS IMBALANCE IS INHERENT IN THE NATURE, if we take, that matter-energy was there at the time of big bang, in any form, then we have to take, matter-energy preexisted, but it is absurd, so it must be, space-time & matter-energy originated only at big bang due to this inherent imbalance. In other words, nature always carries an imbalance & tries to cure it, be it now or at the beginning & shall carry at the end too. Why is this imbalance, I could not solve, please someone answer, or atleast say all the above are wrong, I shall be happy & obliged.

Therefore the imbalance is inherent & a property which nature or the universe can’t do without or the universe would not have taken place, it is an inherent FLAW of the nature.

Subhro Das, Written 13/10/2013

PRINCIPLE OF EXISTENCE

PRINCIPLE OF EXISTENCE

------------------------------------.

Now it is well known in physics that unless something is seen or felt or detected, it’s existence is not sure, that is, unless something is detected by any means, be it human, machine, any living being or any material, that if there is no reaction or act, it can’t be said, it is there.

Einstein did not believe in this, in this quantum mechanics, he said “if I don’t see the moon, will it not be there?” Absurd! But, true, if the moon is not detected, you can’t say the moon is there, for e.g. shut your eyes & try to feel the moonlight, yes you can, as though your eyelids a shallow light comes, shut your eyes, you can easily tell, if it is dark or light, now cover the moon slowly with a canopy & put some faint lights, as of neon lights in place, you will say the moon is there as getting the same feel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

1, WE CAN’T KNOW ALL,,,,,,,,,.

More than that (i.e. above), this detection is never complete & that is a great paradox, because the more you probe, the more is the detection i.e., the more you detect, & the more really come up & that is eternity, so our detection or so also for any other things detections, acts, reactions are never ending process, never complete & so KNOWLEDGE, DETECTION, & EFFECTS about & of anything are also never complete, as much as we can try. We can say, this is known upto this level.

2, EXISTENCE IS RELATIVE,,,,,,,,,,,.

Now go back to the detection process, actually Einstein himself discovered it, but could not realize to this level, he said everything is relative, distance, size, time, space all, but could not say, existence too is relative.

Actually nature is very wild, goes to extreme, far beyond our thought, we could not imagine, that even existence is relative, but it was very easy, if everything is relative, then why not existence?

Einstein could not believe, existence is relative, because it felt impossible for him that if we (ourselves & the earth) could not be detected (for that matter any other thing), we will cease to exist.

3, MASS TOO !,,,,,,,,,,,.

(And if existence is relative, then “mass” also has to be relative, I am petrified what are the repercussions of this, and also comes next matter-energy)

Subhro Das

13/10/13

WHY PHOTONS MOVE ?

WHY PHOTONS MOVE ?

------------------------------------.

The right question should have been “why free photons move ?”

---------------------------------------.

Take a toy, which runs on a tightened (wrapped) spring, i.e. you tighten the spring by moving the key, then release it, the toy begins to jump or dance as spring gets back to its normal loose position, thousands types of such toys are available (although now being replaced by battery driven ones).

Now question is why it jumps, anybody will answer, because of “THE MOTION” released by the decoiling of the spring, then, you hit a great point blindly i.e.ENERGY WHEN FREE IS : IN MOTION & what motion ? The speed of light, yes the speed of light, the toy is (inertia / mass of the toy) hindering the motion, if the motion would be freed from the toy (i.e. take the toy away from the motion if possible), the motion will immediately shoot up with light speed.

So we come to the point any free energy is always moving, otherwise it is not energy. AS CHARACTER OF MASS IS INERTIA, i.e. moving or remaining at a position, i.e. tendency to keep with the relative position with each other (as there is no absolute motion or rest for a material body), but light or any electromagnetic radiations (emr) have no relative motion but an absolute motion. That is 300000 KM/Sec & all free energy has this speed, even that of a toy.

Take another example, all have seen water waves, throw a pebble in a pond, round water waves are made & they move, water molecules don’t move (oscillate only about a mean position), but the motion moves on, yes one may say, it is at a much slow speed, then the answer is the same, had you taken away the water (toy), had you freed the motion, it would gain light speed.

The last example from “particle physics” , in the atoms when electrons jump shells or nuclei decay, photons come off  & these photons were residing in the atom as energy at rest, bound, cocooned, but the moment these photons are (photons are always free, one may think or for the sake of physics or calculations take the photons at rest, but photons at rest no more photons or light or emr, Einstein understood this dual nature of photons & got Nobel for this, I will not go deep into this, as its not the debate here) freed from the atom they shoot at light speed, which the motion of a toy can’t do, only if the toy could have freed the motion totally as an atom does.

One may say unpegged energy shoots at light speed ie 300000 KM/Sec approx. But I don’t know yet why is this fixed speed ? Why not different speed (in vacuum) ?

Subhro Das

Conceptualised 10/08/2011, Written 02/04/2012

QUANTUM MECHANICS TOO IS RELATIVE ?

QUANTUM MECHANICS TOO IS RELATIVE?

----------------------------------------------------------------.

Physicists today mainly use three basic theories to explain the universe, one is “general theory of relativity”, the second is “quantum mechanics” & the third is Newton’s “laws of gravity & motion’.

We will not discuss here Newton’s theory, as this paper is not meant for that, that is, is not the subject of this analysis.

The first general theory of relativity (GTL), it deals with gravity, speed of light, relativity, that is large scale structure of the universe, distances from miles to light years away, a few hundreds of miles to billions of light years (LY) in stretch.

While quantum mechanics (QM) deals with phenomena at extremely low scale, that is sub atomic level, only at stretches of millionth parts of a millimeter.

Here two master theories come into play, first Planck’s “quantum theory”, which basically denies any randomness of quantity (concept of energy packets) & infinite divisibility of matter or energy, second is Heisenberg’s “uncertainty principle”, according to which we can not measure beyond a smallness as the shorter a “particle’s (for example a photon) wave length” is (I am using the term particle instead of ray or any electromagnetic radiation, because of wave particle duality, a particle is nothing but a wave packet, it is conclusively proven & a wave also behaves as a particle), the more it will affect the object of measurement as it will have more energy due to higher frequency & obviously we are not going to measure an apple like big thing with such high frequency, nor is our or Heisenberg’s aim was that, so for only measurement of tiniest of tiniest things & that tiniest of things will get disturbed by the measuring particle, also more important, as it has been taken a particle is also a wave packet so confining it to a precise point is impossible & if that particle has movement at very high rate it becomes more difficult to pinpoint its position & if you pinpoint its position (theoretically, as you can’t do it practically), it’s velocity gets affected.

So it can be seen why at such low scale velocity & position become uncertain to measure.

THE CONTRADICTION.

---------------------------------.

From above two theories (quantum theory & uncertainty principle) do we get a hint of absolute size or measure of anything in nature, that is a basic & fundamental size or measure of anything or not?

Quantum theory predicts an absolute minimum size, a quantum, that is an absolute minimum amount of everything (be it quantity, position or motion, motion is wave length, frequency & velocity, that is, a total wave function), but uncertainty principle predicts, one can not precisely quantify, measure position, velocity at a very small level (quantity too can’t be precisely measured beyond a minimum level, because that means

 one has to break that quantity further & further, but one can not even theoretically & even mathematically divide to the last level as such division will be infinit

So from these two theories we get on one hand an absolute measure of quantity (be that of velocity, mass or position), quantity here, is given by particle’s 3 dimensional shape, on the other we get inherent uncertainty of the above, that is uncertainty of measure of quantity (be that velocity, mass, position).

So both theories are inconsistent to one another, but both true & valid.

NOW THEORY OF RELATIVITY.

---------------------------------------------------.

Now, as per theory of relativity, everything is relative: size (of anything), space (distance between objects), time (interval between events), in other words space-time is relative, be it small as per quantum theory or be it big as per theory of relativity, even at small scale it (everything) should be relative (although at such small scale theory of relativity is not taken into account). That is, at small scale too, it should not be “small enough in absolute term”, that is, behavior of particles can’t be absolute as per theory of relativity, but contradictorily & in fact they become quantum in absolute term, that is behave as quantum also in absolute term.

That is they become “fixed units” & also do “fixed scale” behavior (act also in quantum), as if a quantum is fixed by the NATURE, like an electron is a fixed unit (may be it can be elevated to a higher energy or brought back to a lower energy, but levels are fixed by quanta of energy given to them or taken away by any process otherwise we deny photon/electromagnetic radiation as a quantum & moreover an electron can not be taken down to a lower level than it is at absolute zero temperature) so behavior of an electron or a photon (of a certain energy) is fixed i.e. quantized.

Again below a level, if we want to determine size, position, velocity, whatever, we can not do it with certainty either, it becomes uncertain i.e. they (particles) can’t be fixed further (as a particle has wave particle duality, so it can not be fixed at a point below a minimum area), also it’s acts can not be fixed below a minimum level as our limit is upto a quantum, that is we can be precise upto a level then hand over things to approximation & uncertainty & that there is a  LIMIT  for everything (determined by the nature as nature’s constants, in case of electron too, our determination level is very limited & to know further we require to break apart the electron to its components or take that an electron is an absolute basic building block, which always existed in nature & that too existed even before the universe & the big bang, as could not broken or smashed, but it is not at all permissible as it indicates eternity of matter & energy & negates any beginning of the universe or the end, only way to explain it to say hypothetically, that all electrons at the end change into photons colliding with anti electrons).

So we come to two points, firstly fixedness of size, amount & act due to Planck’s constant, second uncertainty of minimum size, amount & act due to Heisenberg’s uncertainty.

BUT THE NATURE

----------------------------------.

But the nature too is clearly  in favour of a “quantum” as appears from experiments,  observations & real phenomena, example: suppose a photon of a certain energy hits an atom & a photon of lesser energy than the incident photon comes out  leaving behind a part of its energy at that atom & that quantum of energy left back in the atom, is not arbitrary quantum of energy, a fixed quantum depending upon the nature of atom, the photon has hit, if a lesser energy photon hits it then incident photon will come out without losing energy, so a photon of certain energy or of higher certain levels energy has to hit a particular atom so that photon’s energy can be transmitted into the atom & an electron or more of that atom can jump orbit.

FROM ABOVE, A SURPRISING RELATIVITY CAN BE DEDUCED

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

From above a surprising “RELATIVITY” is seen, THAT QUANTUM OF (OF PHOTON) ENERGY LOSS IS ALSO RELATIVE TO A CERTAIN ATOM, THAT IS IF KIND OF ATOM IS CHANGED, QUANTUM OF ENERGY LOSS WOULD (in accordance with Planck’s constant) ALSO CHANGE, SO QUANTUM IS ALSO RELATIVE to a particular atom, & that is in accordance with Einstein’s theory of relativity & is contradictory to Planck’s absolute or fixed quantum, that quantum is also relative depending on electrons, protons & their configurations, that is, Planck’s Quantum theory is true but is also relative, but as Planck’s constant is unchangeable then question is, how it could be relative? It is relative to electron, proton & atomic structure, again atomic structure is relative to electro-magnetic force (emf) & emf depends on wave functions of electrons & protons (wave function is their  BASIC  building blocks & this wave function also gives them their CHARGE & MASS) & wave function is variable.

(But this topic needs more analysis, now it may appear to be very speculative & assumptive, so may be totally baseless.)

Subhro Das

23/02/2011

“EVOLUTIONS OF UNIVERSES”

“EVOLUTIONS OF UNIVERSES”

Pondering over why the universe at all has come into being & what the purpose of it being here, I have come to this, the following concept.

MOST THINK IT IS PURPOSELESS

--------------------------------------------------.

Many will say the universe is purposeless & most do not bother about its purpose, although many religious & spiritual explanations will be given, as if they know it fully, but any scientific explanation about the purpose of the universe is absent, although many scientific concepts are there about the origin of universe, the big bang theory is one of them & most accepted & reasonable one.

My Explanation

----------------------------.

CHANGING LAWS OF NATURE  !!

---------------------------------------------------------.

LAST UNIVERSE WAS NOT SAME & NEXT UNIVERSE WILL NOT BE SAME

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

As I have explained in my previous paper that “laws of nature existed before the universe”, now here I am going further in that analysis.

The universe is the journey of “AWARENESS” from lower level to higher level, “THE JOURNEY OF AWARENESS” only & only, nothing else, all other things are mediums of this journey, and everything is just a medium, be that matter to lower beings.

Matter changes from simpler matter to complex matter, the universe, from the moment of big bang is developing from simplest to complex thing, that is, matter too is in the process of evolution & evolving, as matter evolves into living being, no one can deny that living beings evolved from matter, what ever the process was, what ever the circumstance was, where ever it might have taken place (as some scientists say living being originated in the outer space, some where else & the earth was seeded with spores of living being by a fall of a comet or meteor billions of years back & others say the event (creation of life) took place right on earth billions of years back as situation was apt for it, by the presence of huge methane & other chemicals due to continuous eruptions of volcanoes as earth was still that hot too inside & heavy incessant raining with continuous huge lightenings for millions of years were going on, so a “lab” like situation continued for millions of years & at one moment “some molecules’ came into being which could interact (production of”many such molecules at a time together & their interactions”, is MY conception) & produce further complicated survivable chain of molecules.

Then lower beings to higher beings, this is for what? All this is journey of awareness, from subatomic level to the beings, forms changed, but why? To carry forward the “awareness”, not carry forward only, but the journey of awareness is lower level to higher level, LOWER AWARNESS TO HIGHER AWARENESS, from lower being to human being by the process of evolution & now from human being to the machine(computer), from today’s’ still  dull computer to the futures’ intelligent computer, far more intelligent than human beings, some say, life is the journey of the genes “the selfish gene”, I say, not the journey of living beings or the genes, from inferior to better & better genes & in that “journey of refinement of genes” living beings don’t hesitate a bit to sacrifice their life, watch the reproductive processes of many life forms it is clear, but it is NOT the journey of the life (living being) only, life is only a means of this journey, wrongly it has been taken/theorized, that it is the journey of life, the evolution of life, but LIFE IS ONLY A PART OF THE JOURNEY, it is the journey of the awareness & life is the present  means (today’s) only, then one day awareness will reside in the superior machines of the future.

THE TURN

-------------------------------.

HERE MY THESIS TAKES A SURPRISING TURN, that one day awareness will leave (abandon) even the material base, now improbable to think even, how can awareness live without a material body, it sounds like a talk of an imaginary soul (as religious texts say), but, I believe myself, this imaginary soul does not exist.

THEN, HOW ?

---------------------.

Awareness one day will reside in the floating electrons, cluster of electrons or cluster of + ions (protons) or different types of manmade atomic clusters, that is one day man will make such clusters for keeping different types of awareness (intelligence) in different types of electron & + ion clusters, without residing in a base, in a floating state & these clusters will interact & exchange informations, still these will be man made.

But with time human being will be no more capable of making these extraordinary intelligence bearers, but man made machines themselves will be making them, then one day man made machines too give in, the extraordinary intelligence will be created by themselves, that is, agents for themselves, the story ENDS for most, probably all, here, but my THESIS begins here.

MY POSTULATION

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------.

As the universe will be nearing its end, the awareness will take to quarks, from electron & proton clusters (that is, from electron & +ion clusters to quark bases), that is transfer awareness from nucleons to quarks, it will be done by either man or machine (nanobots), made by human beings, but will be gradually self developed by machines themselves (nanobots), at a very higher level, at one stage in the journey of universe.

As awareness will delve into quarks (still now awareness dwells in quarks, but will be explained LATER in this paper itself) & then from quarks awareness will delve into further deeper “building blocks” of the nature, we are yet to know what is that, (that is, quarks are built of what?) & ULTIMATELY TO THE LAWS OF NATURE (I in my earlier two papers, one very short “Math was there even before the universe” & the 2^nd “Laws of Nature” explained that laws of nature exist beyond the universe, it will stun most & stun Mr. Stephen Hawkins most as it in a little way, “or in a very big way?” contradicts his views), as natures’ laws are ultimate building blocks & can live in “nothingness”, can give BIRTH of UNIVERSE from NOTHINGNESS, because (take this very, very carefully), laws of nature have some inherent FLAWS i.e. all laws tend to transform from one set of form  to another set of form always, all the time, be it on a material base or without a material base i.e. at the end of the universe even if there is  nothingness, natures’ laws will break apart this nothingness immediately, even before a moment passes, from here we get a “VERY NEW concept of TIME”, that is we know there was no time before big bang, time begins with big bang, but we see here “a no time ness period” was how short, virtually it (no time ness) exists for no time, but does exists for that unimaginably short period, in other words nothingness stands not for a moment, the moment nothingness is reached, the big bang takes place, as some inherent imbalance in the laws of nature gives birth to a new universe (I am sure there is one imbalancing factor (I am avoiding using the word: unbalancing, the grammatically correct word)  in the laws of nature, which causes the eruption, as for any activity an imbalancing factor is must, refer to Newton’s Laws. I am yet to find “what is that imbalancing factor in that complete nothingness”.

We may try to find that, if every law has a flaw (the flaw is an unknown dimension, is not able to reconcile with the nothingness, we don’t know) so that, otherwise a law is not dead, stillborn & stationary, that is, a law is productive & can transform, if not, there would have been no universe.

THE ONLY TRANSCENDENTAL THING: “AWARENESS”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------.

(Here I explain also why I said earlier, awareness even now resides in quarks)

But as we will have another universe after the end this universe, the awareness will be transmitted to the building blocks of nature & ultimately to the “laws of nature”, so the next universe will be more intelligent than this, with “better set of natural laws” than ours.

SO MY THEORY

------------------------------.

So my theory is, this universe may perish, not only that many more universes might have perished before, but always the next universe “reborn” is more intelligent, so the STUNNING thing I say “the laws of nature changes, rather evolves, gets better & better.

Actually the “journey” is towards “PERFECTION”, i.e. nature is from eternal period (is it eternal? Or from this we can conclude when nature’s journey began, I analyze it is eternal as I have based my theory on the laws of nature, which is sure, as natures laws too are evolving to be eternal), because laws of nature can exist in nothingness & without these laws the universe could never take birth, so the “JOURNEY” is of “AWARENESS” from one universe to another, making a journey to more awareness  (but one must realize this journey is not ordinary “journey of knowledge”, like towards better genes, better living beings, better machines), better & better, more & more aware & intelligent universes.

BECAUSE

----------------------.

This acquired awareness is being transmitted through more intelligent or should we say more capable, more efficient building blocks & subsequent more efficient nature’s laws, more efficient basic blocks & better laws of nature, so that one universe may be lost, but the awareness, rather we should say efficiency this universe, not the efficiency of human being or machines, but the efficiency of basic blocks & laws by which we are made, will be inherited into our next universe.

So as some/most paint the gloomy picture about the end of the universe, it may not make you that gloomy as you will transcend (not you, but the evolutions of the building blocks & nature’s laws).

OUR KNOWLEDGE WILL SURPASS THIS DEATH.

So we will have more intelligent & more perfect universes in future (we can then say we had lesser intelligent universes in the past), but for the more intelligent universes & lesser intelligent universes we have no record or can’t have any record of past universes as time begins from the moment of big bang, from the MOMEMENT of creation of the new universe, that is every universe has its own time, has its own laws, better laws & better laws means better universe & better universe.

IS IT ETERNAL

-----------------------------.

But this journey towards perfectness will never end, as there is no limit or definition or benchmark for perfectness, so the journey will always be on, from here we also can FORMULATE  the explanation for the beginning of the universes, that there was no beginning as there was no ultimate inferiority, that is, there is nothing like absolute inferiority, so progress to betterment does not begin from a point, in any case, in any matter (be it earthly).

------------------------------------------------------.

SO IT IS LIKE EVOLUTIONS OF LIVING BEINGS, it is “EVOLUTIONS OF UNIVERSES”, but in a very queer & UNIMAGINABLE  way, that nature’s basic building blocks & laws of nature are going through evolutions.

As I have said in my previous paper “decay of space-time in matter & energy, is gravity”, we see this decay manifested as gravity, actually there is no “gravity” as such.

Space-time will end into matter & with matter, at last no matter energy, space-time will remain, only ‘xemr”, an unknown quantumless situation, intolerable for the nature, as some inherent imbalance will be in that situation, an imbalance in the laws of nature itself, which will trigger A NEW UNIVERSE, a better universe.

The Contra Argument

-------------------------------.

It may be argued, if this theory is true then many universes evolved before this one & also perished, some in the first case, past universes were lesser in awareness & intelligence than ours, some in second case, could reach in awareness & intelligence more than that of ours, but argument will be put forward in any case, they must have an impact on our universe, in this regard I can only say that in the first case, if their awareness could not reach a certain level (a level or barrier which we are still to cross in awareness), in which the awareness was not that advanced to reach subatomic i.e. electronic, +ion cluster level or further to quarks’ level, they would not leave any imprint on us, they perished as many “living being species” perish in the course of the biological  evolution & in second case, I think there was no universe before, which developed in awareness far ahead of us or we would not have been here, atleast would not have been same as we are today & if there is a planet in this universe which is far ahead in awareness of us at a far corner of this universe, many light years away, then it does not create any problem or conflict in this theory as like different races & nations on the earth, progress in awareness normally or through fights or friendship or in parallel, the case happens to be the same, & answers the argument.

Subhro das

Conceptualised 14/10/11, Written 25/10/11

My theories & concepts

(I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same)

Subhro Das, India

SPACE, TIME & “GRAVITY”

SPACE, TIME & GRAVITY
-----------------------------------.

Up till now, as Einstein has established that time & space are manifestations of the same thing, they are same entity & conclusively proved “space-time” together make the fourth dimension (other three dimensions are length, width & depth, i.e. length & breadth create an area, a surface & depth gives it the volume, the shape, without these three dimensions no shape or structure would have been possible, a thing whatever thinnest may be must have some thickness, even an atom or an positive ion or an electron, all have these three dimensions) & without this 4^th dimension, existence of anything was impossible, that is without the 4^th dimension none could tell where & when a thing was present, in other words everything we see in the universe would have been so compacted & so eventless that there was no universe, because without 4^th dimension there would be no space-time & without space-time there would be no events & no objects, as for events & objects space-time is must, that is, events & objects can’t exist without existence of space-time, before Einstein none  could even contemplated this, that space-time, the 4^th dimension is an integral part of our existence.

“GRAVITY” BY EINSTEIN

---------------------------------------.

Einstein in his thesis to explain orbital path of an object (a celestial body) said a great thing (such a great thing, that we are yet to realize importance of it), that “GRAVITY DISTORTS THE SPACE”. He said, actually no celestial body (or any object) does bend in its path of motion, it goes straight, but as it travels through a distorted space, a crooked space its path gets crooked (bent) too. The heavier body is the more distorted the space is around it, also the nearer a body is to another body the more distorted space it will have to travel through.

Einstein left it here, he went no further with gravity, he could not explain what gravity is & still now no scientists has been able to do that, except imagining that for gravity there will be a particle, called “graviton”, which is still elusive & imaginary, so there has been no explanation of GRAVITY or progress in this field even after more than hundred years after Einstein’s discovery.

The Link

----------------------------------.

As I tried to understand & explain what gravity is, I took the cue from Einstein’s thesis & it came upon me if as per Einstein’s theory “gravity distorts space”, that means gravity affects the space, that also means space too has an effect on the gravity, that is space too interacts with gravity, it clearly means both (the space & the gravity) have a correlation & the great implication of it, is that, as space-time are same as it is a proven fact, so gravity also distorts time, as space & time are same entity, this means gravity, space & time are correlated. In other words there is surely a relation between space, time & gravity. And that is, the relation extends to “time”, as time too gets affected by gravity, same as the space gets affected.

My Conclusion

------------------------.

SPACE, TIME & GRAVITY ARE SAME THING !

As time & space are same, has been proven by Einstein, that is they are different forms of same thing as they appear to us, so extending the same thesis as explained above, it can be derived (it may surely stun many) space, time & gravity are not different, only different forms of same thing. No theory or any words so far by anybody has been put forward, except this one by me (atleast not in my knowledge) relating the three.

I hereby, have tried for a theory to explain the problem of gravity, so far which remains elusive & beyond any explanations that space, time & gravity are same, that is manifestations of same thing & not virtual manifestations as they (many scientists say electromagnetic force, that attraction or repulsion between (-) & (+) charges/poles are done by virtual photons, which have not been detected, which I think, is imaginary, not only imaginary, but to fill a gap. But, if time, space & gravity are same thing, it changes all theory & puts GRAVITY in another context, fully different from any earlier concepts of gravity, even space-time. We begin to explain & take GRAVITY, not only take, but, gravity in the first place in any space time interpretation, which so far not done by any physicists.

Therefore I add a new a concept to “G’ in science, that is “G” does not exist, but a manifestation of space-time only in another objective (mind it I said objective) form i.e.  material form. That, otherwise space-time even being the 4^th dimension, an essential part of existence remains only subjective, we don’t incorporate them in mathematical equations (except that in classical Newtonian laws of motion, where time is taken only as a measurement, not as a force), but as we convert (interpret) space-time into “G”, space-time also becomes objective.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(In this regard I say I have tried explain Gravity in a very, very little & queer way, although it provides a new theory for “gravity”’ but that will take time to explain, also I don’t know if I shall be able to do that, but some concepts have come to my mind, I am listing a few of them below).

-----------------.

-----------------------------.

These are very, very IMPORTANT for Considerations:-

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------.

= Space is negative, that is, it’s a negative field.

= All matters are sucking space around it, all the time. And this is the ORIGIN of gravity.

= There is no “graviton”.

= Gravity is quantumless, so far any thing discovered, be it quarks or neutrinos or light, has a quantum.

= Now most QUEER of all, that is, all bodies by gravity are losing mass (which we perceive wrongly that all bodies are radiating gravity), by sucking of space by the bodies. SO ALL BODIES ARE LOSING MASS.

= Not only all material bodies suck space, but also LIGHT & all electro magnetic radiations (emr), suck space & lose mass.

= How the light (or any thing) can lose mass? And if at all loses mass, what happens to the lost mass? This loss of mass is very slow indeed compared to the original mass of a photon (or any thing), but continuous, so, as light travels for billions of years through space, its wave length increases & that, a single photon all the time keeps losing the frequency (strength), so the mass too gets reduced in billions of years, And to the question what happens to the lost mass, I propose all bodies & also light give out  hitherto an unknown radiation (I also don’t know what is it), I have named it “xemr”, taking cue from “electro magnetic radiation”, but I believe it is the last & the end of all things, THE VERY END or the very beginning, I want to say, the universe is decaying in this way & will end up in this way, that is, all matter energy by transforming into xemr in billions or trillions of years, to the virtual NOTHINGNESS, which would not even last for a moment, explode into another big bang.

= All bodies & everything are decaying by losing mass & dispensing “xemr” & we see it’s manifestation as GRAVITY.

= Even LIGHT  too has mass & GRAVITY, otherwise light would not interact with gravity, as we have seen it does while passing by a very massive celestial object.

= As it is said that 3/4^th of total mass of the universe is the dark matter, I postulate the DARK MATTER is the space itself as it is negative & interacts with bodies, because as per Einstein “Gravity distorts space”, so we can derive safely both space & the matter attract each other.

Also if above is true then as it is being claimed that the dark matter is holding the universe & the galaxies together & in place or the universe & the galaxies would break apart, this dark matter is nothing but the space, as I have explained previously the character of space, that, it is negative, it interacts with matter, ACTUALLY IT IS THE NATURE’S ANTIMATTER, created with the Big Bang.

Also it can explain, if 3/4^th of the universe is the DARK MATTER, then we don’t have to search for it, many light years away into deep space, we have to have it here, around us & THAT IS SPACE.

Subhro Das

India

Conceptualized 25/04/10, Written 14/10/11

 (My theories & concepts

 I write my theories & concepts in short as I am a banker & have little time to write in a book like or research file like form, but I do feel these theories & concepts must be circulated for the good of the world & people, anyone is free to elaborate or write on them or point out if any flaw or deficiency in the same)

Subhro Das